@ginacostag_
Gina Acosta
Gina Acosta66.1K
Gina Acosta
This creator added themselves. Not verified by unfair.so.
@ginacostag_AI ToolsAI VideoAI Agents

Data Analyst • Data Engineer • Content Creator • Google WTM Ambassador • +200k Linkedin: https://t.co/0ioWJTcv6D DM for collabs 📩 [email protected]

66.1KFollowers
7.6KMedian impr. / post
0.2%Engagement
12+7
Paid partnerships
In their audience
3+ affiliated with @dreamina_ai follow Gina Acosta
@SirGlavan_@Hacknaut@bigwonbots2+ affiliated with @aiscwork2+ affiliated with @capcutapp2+ affiliated with @imagineart_x2+ from @ycombinator2+ affiliated with @merlinaibyfoyer
1,500+ verified followers analyzed
@SirGlavan_@Hacknaut@bigwonbots+149763+ media creators58+ AI creators55+ AI founders35+ founders34+ creators33+ executives
25–34 core age group
60.2%
25.2% of audience in United States
🇺🇸
Aug 29 – Sep 494 posts analyzed · replies not counted · updates weekly
ImpressionsEngagements
70.6K35.3K0
3671840
Aug 29Aug 30Aug 31Sep 1Sep 2Sep 3Sep 4
Past collabs
Gina Acosta@ginacostag_ · Jul 27A vendor claimed their API was 40x faster than the competition. The number was real. The comparison wasn't. I write about AI infrastructure and build the explainer graphics people actually bookmark. My whole job is checking the number before it goes on a chart. Every launch ships a benchmark now. Almost none ship the methodology. To know if a claim is honest, you have to dig: → what was actually measured → on what hardware, at what payload → whether competitors were configured fairly, or just quoted off their own marketing pages That's an afternoon. Per claim. So for a while, I skipped the technical comparisons. Not worth the time. Which meant the best posts went to people just restating the press release. Now an AI employee does that legwork. He pulls: - the published numbers - the methodology (if one exists) - the changelog - what competitors claim in their own docs Then lays it all side by side with the gaps marked. Last week: a latency claim of 62ms vs. a field quoted at 244ms–2.6s. The 62ms was real. Reproducible. But: → 62ms was measured on cached queries → competitor numbers were cold starts, lifted straight from marketing pages Like for like? The real gap was ~3x. Not 40x. Still a good number. Just not the headline. That mismatch became the graphic. He assembles. I verify every source. Then it ships. The bottleneck in technical content was never the design. It was never having the time to check if the claim was true. Tell me I'm wrong. Hire @viktor_com for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment.ViktorPaid partnership23K views
Planning a launch?Gina Acosta is one of 200 curated B2B creators. Tell us what you are launching and we will put the shortlist together.
Built with unfair.so
1 picked$400