unfair.so
Browse more creators
@hsquareweb3
Web3 gal
Web3 gal6.2K
Web3 gal
This creator added themselves. Not verified by unfair.so.
@hsquareweb3DeFiWeb3Crypto Trading

Web3 Enthusiast || Content Writer|| Airdrop Hunter ||Technical analyst || Ambassador @NodeOpsHQ

6.2KFollowers
467Median impr. / post
12.7%Engagement
11+6
Paid partnerships
In their audience
5+ affiliated with @coinmarketcap follow Web3 gal
@WhalePiz@Sdyahaya_@Raees0x@Cadillac214@Web3Chidex5+ affiliated with @manutd5+ affiliated with @xora_finance4+ affiliated with @axisrobotics4+ affiliated with @chelseafc4+ affiliated with @weteamng
1,500+ verified followers analyzed
@WhalePiz@Sdyahaya_@Raees0x@Cadillac214@Web3Chidex+1495257+ media creators122+ crypto creators37+ creators32+ AI creators29+ crypto researchers26+ founders
Last 7 days46 posts analyzed · replies not counted · updates weekly
ImpressionsEngagements
7003500
173870
Aug 30Aug 31Sep 1Sep 2Sep 3Sep 4Sep 5
Past collabs
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Sep 3More routes don't necessarily mean better execution. The real advantage comes from being able to compare them. That's what caught my attention with the latest Omniston update on http://STON.fi. Omniston now supports DeDust v2 and Tonco v2 pools, adding more liquidity sources to the routes it can evaluate for TON swaps. Instead of checking different DEXs manually, Omniston can compare available routes and look for a more efficient path for the trade. It's a small infrastructure update, but it addresses a real problem in DeFi: Liquidity is often fragmented. The more sources a routing layer can access, the more options it has when looking for efficient execution. That's where aggregation becomes useful. You don't need to know which pool has the best route before every swap. The routing layer does the work. @ston_fi #STONfi #TON #DeFi #Omniston #CryptoSTONPaid partnership236 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Aug 31Not me 😂 I’m all for the direct route. Cross-chain shouldn’t feel like moving your bags from one terminal to another. https://STON.fi is making the journey smoother, and now I’m curious about what’s coming 👀 #STONfi #DeFi #TONSTONPaid partnership166 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Aug 30One problem with many DeFi protocols is that users can participate in the product without having much say in how the protocol evolves. You can trade, provide liquidity or hold the token, but when an important decision comes up, governance can feel completely separate from the people actually using the protocol. This is where http://STON.fi DAO becomes interesting. http://STON.fi connects governance with staking. Instead of simply holding STON, users can stake their STON for a selected period. In return, they receive ARKENSTON, which represents voting power in the DAO. That voting power can then be used to participate in governance proposals. The basic idea is: Stake STON → receive ARKENSTON → gain voting power → participate in decisions. The staking period matters too. http://STON.fi allows staking for 3 to 24 months, so governance isn't simply about who happens to hold the most tokens at a particular moment. The DAO gives the community a mechanism to participate in decisions around the protocol, including proposals involving things like treasury use and development. I think this is an important part of DeFi that often gets overlooked. A decentralized exchange isn't only about decentralized trading. The bigger question is who gets a voice when the protocol needs to make decisions. That's the problem http://STON.fi is trying to address through its DAO. 🔗 http://STON.fi DAO #STONfi #TON #DeFi #DAOSTONPaid partnership167 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Aug 21Good Morning, CT 👋 Here’s something I’ve been thinking about in DeFi: What happens when the liquidity you need is scattered across different markets? Imagine you want to swap TON for another token. You open a DEX like http://STON.fi and check the available swap. But here's the interesting part: What if another liquidity source has a better quote? Would you really want to open multiple DEXs, compare prices manually, check liquidity, and then figure out where to execute the trade? Probably not. And this is where http://STON.fi's Omniston becomes interesting. Instead of relying on just one liquidity source, Omniston can connect to multiple DEXs and RFQ resolvers. A swap request can be sent to different liquidity sources. They return their quotes. Those quotes are compared. And the best available quote can be selected for execution. So from the user's perspective, the process can remain simple: Choose your token → Enter the amount → Swap But underneath that simple experience, there's more happening. Liquidity is being searched. Quotes are being compared. Different execution options are being evaluated. And the goal is to help users access liquidity more efficiently. Because as TON DeFi grows, liquidity won't necessarily live in one place. More protocols can mean more liquidity. But it can also mean more fragmentation. And that's why I think liquidity aggregation is becoming increasingly important. **Having liquidity is one thing. Being able to efficiently access the right liquidity is another.** That's the part of http://STON.fi's infrastructure that I find particularly interesting. And it makes me wonder: As TON DeFi continues to expand, will liquidity aggregation become just as important as liquidity itself? @ston_fi #STONfi #TON #DeFi #OmnistonSTONPaid partnership265 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Aug 20Good morning, CT 👋 Telegram-native crypto is about to get even more interesting. 👀 Telegram is preparing to bring a native, non-custodial Gram Wallet into the ecosystem. And that raises a bigger question: What are people actually going to build around it? That’s what caught my attention about today’s http://STON.fi live session. The discussion will bring together teams building Telegram-native products, including WenLong, Gram Store and DTrade, to talk about what they're building, how users interact with these products, and what builders expect from the Gram Wallet launch. They’ll also dive into something I’m particularly interested in: How http://STON.fi infrastructure can support this next wave of Telegram-native crypto applications. There will also be a live community poll, so the audience gets to contribute to the conversation. 📅 Today, August 20 ⏰ 15:00 UTC And there’s a little incentive to stay until the end 👀 A question from the speakers will be posted after the session, with 150 STON in total rewards: • 1 best answer — 70 STON • 2 random winners — 40 STON each If you're interested in the intersection of Telegram + TON + DeFi, this is one I'd keep an eye on. The bigger question isn't just “When is the wallet launching?” It's: “What will builders create once millions of Telegram users can access crypto natively?” That’s the part I’m curious about. @ston_fi #STONfi #TON #Telegram #DeFi #GramWalletSTONPaid partnership266 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Aug 19Good evening, CT 👋 Let’s talk about something in DeFi that sounds simple but is actually pretty interesting: If There’s No Order Book, Who Are You Actually Trading With? On a centralized exchange, trading usually feels familiar. You see buyers. You see sellers. You see an order book. Someone wants to buy at a certain price, someone else wants to sell, and the exchange matches those orders. But decentralized exchanges can work very differently. So when you open a DEX and swap one token for another, you might wonder: “If there isn't a traditional order book, who is on the other side of my trade?” The answer is often: A liquidity pool. Instead of matching your order with another trader, an automated market maker (AMM) uses liquidity supplied to a pool to facilitate the swap. For example, imagine a pool containing: TON + USDT Liquidity providers deposit both assets into the pool. When you want to swap TON for USDT, you're interacting with that pool. Your TON goes into the pool. USDT comes out. The AMM's pricing mechanism determines how much USDT you receive based on the pool's available liquidity and the size of your trade. No person needs to manually accept your order. No traditional order book needs to match two traders. The smart contract handles the process. And this is one of the fundamental ideas behind AMM-based DeFi. But there's an important trade-off: The pool isn't infinite. If you make a relatively small trade against a deep pool, the impact on the pool's balance may be small. But if you make a large trade against a shallow pool, you can move the pool's price significantly. That's one reason liquidity matters so much in DeFi. More usable liquidity can generally help markets handle trades more efficiently. So the next time you press Swap on a DEX like http://STON.fi, remember: You're not simply trading against another person. You're interacting with an automated market built from liquidity supplied by participants in the ecosystem. And that leads to the next question: Why would anyone provide that liquidity in the first place? That's where liquidity providers and LP fees enter the story. @ston_fi #STONfi #TON #DeFi #AMMSTONPaid partnership272 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Aug 19More Liquidity Doesn’t Always Mean Better Liquidity DeFi has a liquidity problem that often gets overlooked: Liquidity can be everywhere and still be difficult to use. Imagine a market with $10M in liquidity. Sounds healthy, right? Now imagine that liquidity is split across multiple pools, different venues, different assets and different trading routes. The total number might look impressive. But a trader doesn't interact with the total number. They interact with the liquidity available for their specific trade. This is where fragmentation becomes important. When liquidity is fragmented, a trade may experience: → Higher price impact → More complicated execution → Worse pricing → Greater slippage → Less efficient markets And as more assets and applications enter an ecosystem, this problem can become even more noticeable. That's why I think the conversation around DeFi liquidity needs to evolve. Instead of asking: “How much liquidity exists?” We should also ask: “How accessible and efficiently usable is that liquidity?” This is one of the reasons DEX infrastructure matters. A good decentralized exchange isn't simply a collection of liquidity pools. It's infrastructure designed to help traders interact with available liquidity efficiently. For an ecosystem like TON, where more users and applications are expected to interact on-chain, this becomes increasingly important. And this is where protocols such as http://STON.fi become interesting to watch. The goal shouldn't simply be to accumulate liquidity. The goal should be to build markets where that liquidity can actually work for users. Because in DeFi, liquidity sitting somewhere is one thing. liquidity that can efficiently serve a trader is another. That's the difference between having liquidity... and having usable liquidity. @ston_fi #STONfi #TON #DeFiSTONPaid partnership295 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Jul 15Most Solana founders think scaling is about getting more users. I think they're only half right. The real challenge begins after the product gains traction. Contributor payouts. Investor vesting. Treasury management. Community distributions. Financial approvals. The more successful your protocol becomes, the more complex these operations get. After researching Streamflow Business, I realized it isn't just another Web3 tool. It's designed to help Solana teams run their financial operations with the same efficiency they expect from their technology. Here's why I believe every founder and operations team should pay attention.Streamflow BusinessPaid partnership560 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Jul 121/7 XBIT World Cup Leverage Carnival: Everything You Need to Know The FIFA World Cup is one of the biggest sporting events in the world, attracting millions of fans every matchday. This year, XBIT is bringing that excitement on chain through its World Cup Leverage Carnival, combining prediction markets, leverage trading, and a campaign with over $1 million in rewards. In this thread, we'll explore how the event works, the opportunities it offers, and what participants should know before getting started. ⬇️ @XBITDEX @XBITDEX_ZH #XBIT #XBITCreatorXBITPaid partnership643 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Jul 8I’ve heard countless L1s promise they’ve solved the trilemma. But after watching the space for a while, it’s clear most projects quietly accept the same compromise. Faster chains often sacrifice some decentralization. Decentralized ones accept slower speed. Secure ones accept limited scalability. Roadmaps keep promising future fixes, but the structural tension never really disappears. @Xphere_official took a different approach. They didn’t try to tweak the trade-offs. They redesigned the architecture from the ground up.XpherePaid partnership408 views
Web3 gal@hsquareweb3 · Jun 13Most NFTs feel like buying a fancy house… then realizing you’re locked outside the gates forever. You have the deed but you cannot reside within it while also being unable to build anything or claim it as your own property. That’s exactly why @5th_Kingdom hit different when I read their litepaper. The project operates as a permanent digital world on Solana which gives value to your NFT collection. Here’s what got me excited @Bellickkruz #5thKingdomThreadContest5th KingdomPaid partnership545 views
Planning a launch?Web3 gal is one of 200 curated B2B creators. Tell us what you are launching and we will put the shortlist together.
[email protected]·t.me/fdrtrm
Built with unfair.so
1 picked$100